Check the input, output, credits, and example result, then try this model directly on the page. Move into Studio when you need saved history, assets, or longer iteration.
Example output
Best for inbox replies, support follow-up, and calm operational communication.
chat thread
Ask Rivya to summarize quickly, do lightweight analysis, or handle frequent low-cost collaboration tasks.
Chat preview for concise response drafting in Rivya.
Output
Best for inbox replies, support follow-up, and calm operational communication.
Best for
Inbox triage and quick internal Q&AFirst-pass rewrites for emails, docs, and support repliesBudget-sensitive internal summaries and rewritesFast extraction from notes, transcripts, and pasted text
Supports
Chat
Online trial
Try Claude Haiku 4.5
Use Claude Haiku 4.5 for fast Claude chat, lightweight rewrites, quick summaries, and lower-cost daily assistant work.
Input setup
Prepare this run
Estimated credits: 2+
Chat controls
Choose when Rivya can search the web, how much reasoning it should use, and whether to include model thoughts when the selected model supports them.
Thoughts
Let the model default decide, or explicitly include or hide thought traces when the provider supports them.
Start a conversation to turn planning, prompting, and creative direction into one reusable thread.
Prompt starters
Start Claude Haiku 4.5 with a proven prompt
Use a template already mapped to Claude Haiku 4.5 when you want a stronger first run than a blank prompt.
Ask Rivya to summarize quickly, do lightweight analysis, or handle frequent low-cost collaboration tasks.
Chat preview for concise response drafting in Rivya.
Output
Best for inbox replies, support follow-up, and calm operational communication.
Lead sample
Best for inbox replies, support follow-up, and calm operational communication.
Chat preview for concise response drafting in Rivya.
Input
Prompt only
What to notice
Chat preview for concise response drafting in Rivya.
Credits per use
Pay per use — credits based on usage
Why this model works
Why this model works
Better suited for low-latency, high-frequency use
Much cheaper token pricing than Sonnet or Opus
Text-first Claude project in Rivya's current front end
Best-fit tasks
Best-fit tasks
Inbox triage and quick internal Q&AFirst-pass rewrites for emails, docs, and support repliesBudget-sensitive internal summaries and rewritesFast extraction from notes, transcripts, and pasted text
Model proof
chat thread
Ask Rivya to summarize quickly, do lightweight analysis, or handle frequent low-cost collaboration tasks.
Conversation preview for Short Reply Tone Fix Chat.
Useful when a reply is technically correct but too abrupt for a customer.
Conversation preview for Short Reply Tone Fix Chat.
chat thread
Ask Rivya to summarize quickly, do lightweight analysis, or handle frequent low-cost collaboration tasks.
Conversation preview for Support Macro Tightener Chat.
Keeps repeated support replies useful without expanding policy claims.
Conversation preview for Support Macro Tightener Chat.
Decision fit
When this model is the right choice
Decision fit
Fit signals
Better suited for low-latency, high-frequency use
Much cheaper token pricing than Sonnet or Opus
Text-first Claude project in Rivya's current front end
Useful for lightweight analysis and rewrites
Fits cost-sensitive everyday collaboration
Best-fit tasks
Use it when the task looks like this
Inbox triage and quick internal Q&AFirst-pass rewrites for emails, docs, and support repliesBudget-sensitive internal summaries and rewritesFast extraction from notes, transcripts, and pasted text
Quiet facts
Inputs, output, and credits to confirm
Provider
Anthropic
Category
Chat
Capabilities
Chat
Credit model
Pay per use — credits based on usage
Input path
Prompt only
Prompt setup
Up to 20,000 chars
FAQ
Claude Haiku 4.5 FAQ
When should I use Claude Haiku 4.5 for chat work?
Use Claude Haiku 4.5 for fast, repeatable text work: inbox triage, internal Q&A, email rewrites, support replies, note extraction, and short summaries. It is a practical Claude option when response time and lower token cost matter more than the deepest analysis.
What is Claude Haiku 4.5's real scope on Rivya right now?
On Rivya, Claude Haiku 4.5 currently runs as a text-first chat project.
Which controls or inputs matter most once you're evaluating Claude Haiku 4.5 for real work?
Give it the source text, the audience, the action you want, and a clear output format. Haiku has few setup choices on this page, so a focused brief matters more than adjusting controls.
When is Claude Haiku 4.5 worth token-based spend?
Rivya currently bills 70 input credits and 350 output credits per million tokens. That tier fits high-volume short tasks where Haiku's speed and lower Claude-family cost can reduce the expense of repeated turns.
When should I choose Claude Haiku 4.5 over lighter or more expensive chat models?
Choose Haiku over Sonnet or Opus for faster, lower-cost routine work. Choose Sonnet when writing judgment or nuance matters more, and Opus when the analysis is difficult enough to justify the higher token tier.
What can I test first on this page?
Start here when the first response should test inbox triage, quick internal Q&A, first-pass rewrites, support replies, or budget-sensitive summaries on one Claude model. That gives you a contained first turn to check the prompt, direction, and response quality before moving into a longer project.
What can I set up on this page?
This page is set up as the public chat entry for Claude Haiku 4.5. That keeps the first result centered on inbox triage and quick internal Q&A instead of forcing the work into a longer thread too early.
What should I line up before I send the first turn?
Before the first turn, it matters more to line up the task frame, source material, and how careful the answer needs to be than to hunt for extra controls. On a text-first chat option like Claude Haiku 4.5, that opening setup usually decides whether the first result is strong enough for inbox triage and quick internal Q&A.
Do I need to sign in before I send here, and how do credits work?
The page is publicly visible, but the actual first send is still gated behind sign in. Rivya currently bills this by usage: 70 input credits and 350 output credits per million tokens. You can use this page to frame the question and choose the model first, then sign in when you are ready to start the live thread.
When should I stay on this page, and when should I move into the full Studio?
Stay on this page while the job is still a first conversation and you are testing whether Claude Haiku 4.5 can get traction on inbox triage and quick internal Q&A from the first turn. Open the full Studio once the work needs saved context, attached files, follow-up rounds, or a thread you know you will keep expanding.
Compare alternatives
Other models to consider next
Chat
GPT-5.5
OpenAI's advanced GPT chat model on Rivya for complex reasoning, image-aware analysis, research synthesis, and structured writing when the brief needs more room.
Why consider it
Consider it when your next task needs Prompt + optional images.
InputPrompt + optional images
CreditsPay per use - credits based on usage
Best forResearch synthesis across long or messy source packets
OpenAI's higher-end AI chat model on Rivya, with stronger structured input handling, reasoning control, and tool-oriented conversation projects for more complex analysis and writing tasks.
Why consider it
Consider it when your next task needs Prompt + optional images.
InputPrompt + optional images
CreditsPay per use — credits based on usage
Best forLong strategic briefs and decision memos
Chat
GPT-5.4 Codex
OpenAI's higher-end Codex model on Rivya, with stronger coding, structured reasoning, and tool-oriented collaboration for demanding repo-scale development projects.
Why consider it
Consider it when your next task needs Prompt + optional images.
InputPrompt + optional images
CreditsPay per use — credits based on usage
Best forRepo-scale debugging and architecture review