Review ownership, input rights, provider terms, claims, approvals, and client delivery before using Rivya AI outputs commercially.

Use this commercial use guide before you publish, deliver, or bill for work made with Rivya.

Rivya can help you create AI images, videos, audio, chat outputs, and tool-assisted assets for real work, but commercial use still requires review.

The safest way to think about generated content is: Rivya helps produce outputs, and you are responsible for checking whether those outputs, inputs, claims, and approvals fit the intended use.

What This Page Covers

This page explains what to review before using Rivya outputs in commercial contexts such as:

product pages
paid ads
social campaigns
landing pages
client deliverables
voice-over or narration
product demo videos
localized campaign assets

For a short operational checklist, read Commercial Review Checklist.

Prompts, Uploads, And Outputs

A Rivya task can include several layers:

your prompt or script
uploaded reference images, videos, or audio files
generated outputs
provider processing needed to run the workflow
edits or reuse after the output is created

Commercial review should include all of those layers, not only the final image, video, or audio file.

Review Your Inputs First

Before uploading or using source material, confirm that you have the right to use it.

Pay special attention to:

product photos
brand logos
customer images
client-owned assets
licensed photography
voices and likenesses
unreleased product information
confidential documents or files

If the input is sensitive or you do not have permission, do not upload it.

For upload safety, read Safe Upload Guidelines.

Review The Output For Accuracy

Generated outputs can drift.

Before commercial use, check:

whether the product is represented accurately
whether packaging, labels, or logos are acceptable
whether the output implies a claim you cannot support
whether generated people, voices, or scenes create rights concerns
whether the asset fits the brand and channel
whether the output needs editing before publication

A visually strong asset can still be commercially risky if it misrepresents the product.

Review Claims And Regulated Contexts

Be careful with content that suggests:

health or medical outcomes
financial results
legal advice
safety claims
performance guarantees
before-and-after transformations
competitor comparisons

If a claim needs substantiation, legal review, or client approval, handle that outside the generation workflow before publishing.

Provider Processing

Some Rivya workflows rely on third-party providers to process prompts, uploads, and outputs.

That means your review should include:

what kind of input is being sent
whether the workflow needs uploaded files
whether sensitive data is necessary for the task
whether provider-related expectations are acceptable for the use case

For more detail, read Data and Provider Processing in Rivya and Provider and Commercial-Use Matrix.

Client And Team Approval

For client or team work, define approval before final delivery.

A practical handoff should include:

the final asset
the intended placement
notes about prompts or references used when relevant
any visible limitations or review caveats
whether the asset was edited after generation
who approved the final version

Do not assume that a generated output is approved just because it looks finished.

What Rivya Does Not Replace

Rivya does not replace:

legal advice
client approval
brand governance
product claim substantiation
rights clearance for third-party inputs
final editorial review

Use Rivya to create and iterate. Use your normal approval process to publish or deliver.

Rivya Commercial Use and Ownership Guide